Skip to content
Tameside Counts — Tameside, in numbers.Local help →

Tameside, in numbers

Action plan

Tameside council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Practical proposed steps for Tameside.

The stages explain what should happen first. They are not promised completion dates. Funding, powers and ongoing costs need to be established before a proposal is adopted.

  1. Keep the market at the centre of Ashton’s renewal
  2. Roadworks change how people reach Stalybridge
  3. Bring Hyde’s empty library site back into use
  4. Protect new public spaces from deteriorating
  5. Make room for homes people can afford
  6. Plan homes and care around an older population
  7. Bring support closer to people in poor health
  8. Connect local skills to local opportunities
  9. Turn published plans into visible progress
  10. Target support where disadvantages overlap

Proposal

Keep the market at the centre of Ashton’s renewal

The Market Square project retains trading and community uses.

Proposed response: Make stall availability and access clear.

Evidence

Who could lead: Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.

  1. Start now

    Make stall availability and access clear.

  2. Over the next few years

    Support a mix of everyday traders and events.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review occupancy and regular shopping visits.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Ashton Market Square: Construction programme published; final completion not verified.

Measure: Occupied stalls and repeat shoppers.

Trade-off: A good-looking square alone will not sustain businesses.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Ashton Market Square →

Proposal

Roadworks change how people reach Stalybridge

The programme includes temporary street restrictions.

Proposed response: Maintain clear step-free routes and business signs.

Evidence

Who could lead: Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.

  1. Start now

    Maintain clear step-free routes and business signs.

  2. Over the next few years

    Coordinate deliveries and bus information during each phase.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check access after the works finish.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Stalybridge town-centre streets: Phased works programme; current restrictions need checking.

Measure: Access complaints and routes kept available.

Trade-off: Keeping traffic moving can limit construction speed.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Stalybridge town-centre streets →

Proposal

Bring Hyde’s empty library site back into use

The approved redevelopment would add homes while retaining the historic frontage.

Proposed response: Publish the construction and housing-tenure details.

Evidence

Who could lead: Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.

  1. Start now

    Publish the construction and housing-tenure details.

  2. Over the next few years

    Connect new residents to shops and public transport.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track occupied homes and upkeep of the frontage.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Former Hyde Library homes: Sale and planning approval confirmed.

Measure: Homes completed and occupied.

Trade-off: Heritage repairs add cost and must not be reduced to a façade exercise.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Former Hyde Library homes →

Proposal

Protect new public spaces from deteriorating

Ashton and Stalybridge are investing in surfaces, lighting and street furniture that need upkeep. This is a forward operating risk.

Proposed response: Assign maintenance responsibilities before handover.

Evidence 1 · Evidence 2

Who could lead: Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.

  1. Start now

    Assign maintenance responsibilities before handover.

  2. Over the next few years

    Publish repair response times and an annual budget.

  3. Over the longer term

    Renew the most-used routes before faults accumulate.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Ashton Market Square: Construction programme published; final completion not verified; Stalybridge town-centre streets: Phased works programme; current restrictions need checking.

Measure: Lighting faults, repair times and accessible surfaces.

Trade-off: Maintenance spending competes with new capital projects.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Ashton Market Square →

Stalybridge town-centre streets →

Proposal

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £931 a month (August 2026) in Tameside council area. This is £528 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 9.8% in Denton South to 27.7% in Ashton St Michael's — a gap of 17.8 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

Who could lead: The housing and planning authorities, housing associations and developers.

  1. Start now

    Publish the local waiting list, temporary accommodation and affordable-home delivery figures together. Start by checking the different needs in Ashton St Michael's and Denton South; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test proposed housing sites against affordable-home need, access to work, school places and water capacity.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check whether completed homes reduce unmet need, rather than counting planning permissions as delivery.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Average private rent is £931 a month (August 2026) in Tameside council area. Homes rented privately ranged from 9.8% in Denton South to 27.7% in Ashton St Michael's — a gap of 17.8 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 19 of 19 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Affordable homes completed, households waiting, time in temporary accommodation, and rent compared with local earnings.

Trade-off: More homes can put pressure on infrastructure and land. Affordability requirements also affect development viability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Average monthly rent →

Evidence: Average home price →

Former Hyde Library homes →

Proposal

Plan homes and care around an older population

17.5% of people in Tameside council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 11.6% in St Peter's to 22.6% in Dukinfield Stalybridge — a gap of 10.9 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

Who could lead: Adult social care, local health services, housing providers and transport authorities.

  1. Start now

    Compare the location of older residents with access to care, shops and transport. Start by checking the different needs in Dukinfield Stalybridge and St Peter's; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Prioritise home adaptations and care capacity in places with the clearest unmet need.

  3. Over the longer term

    Build accessible homes and joined-up care into local development plans.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 17.5% aged 65 or over; 21 March 2021. People aged 65 or over ranged from 11.6% in St Peter's to 22.6% in Dukinfield Stalybridge — a gap of 10.9 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 19 of 19 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Waits for home adaptations and care, avoidable hospital stays, and accessible homes delivered.

Trade-off: Services need skilled staff and ongoing funding. Age profiles alone cannot measure unmet care need.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 65 or over →

Proposal

Bring support closer to people in poor health

6.6% of people reported bad or very bad health in Tameside council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 4.8% in Stalybridge South to 7.9% in Denton South — a gap of 3.1 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

Who could lead: Local health services, public health teams, employers and community organisations.

  1. Start now

    Use neighbourhood evidence to find where poor health and barriers to services overlap. Start by checking the different needs in Denton South and Stalybridge South; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test accessible local support and publish who is reached and who is missed.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review whether health gaps narrow, alongside housing and employment improvements.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 6.6% reporting bad or very bad health; 21 March 2021. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 4.8% in Stalybridge South to 7.9% in Denton South — a gap of 3.1 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 19 of 19 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Access to services and the health gap between neighbourhoods, using comparable age-adjusted measures when available.

Trade-off: A census snapshot is dated. New service decisions also need current needs assessments and residents’ experience.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People reporting bad or very bad health →

Proposal

Connect local skills to local opportunities

24.4% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Tameside council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 15.5% in Mossley to 28.1% in St Peter's — a gap of 12.6 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

Who could lead: Employers, colleges, universities and the relevant skills authority.

  1. Start now

    Compare vacancies and employer needs with training available to local residents. Start by checking the different needs in St Peter's and Mossley; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Link training to real jobs, including routes for people without formal qualifications.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained employment and earnings after training, not just course starts.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 24.4% with a degree or equivalent; 21 March 2021. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 15.5% in Mossley to 28.1% in St Peter's — a gap of 12.6 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 19 of 19 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Sustained jobs, earnings and training completion for residents who face barriers to work.

Trade-off: Training takes time and cannot create demand for jobs on its own. Qualifications are not a complete measure of ability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent →

Evidence: People aged 16+ with no qualifications →

Ashton Market Square →

Proposal

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

Who could lead: The named project owners and council scrutiny bodies.

  1. Start now

    Put the scope, owner, funding position and next milestone in one public place.

  2. Over the next few years

    Report delivery against the agreed scope and explain delays or changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check the benefits residents actually receive after completion.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The dated stages in Projects; unknown costs and funding remain unknown.

Measure: Milestones met, costs against the approved budget, and measured outcomes after delivery.

Trade-off: Delivery reporting takes staff time, but a launch announcement alone cannot show value for money.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Ashton Market Square →

Stalybridge town-centre streets →

Former Hyde Library homes →

Proposal

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 16.2% in Stalybridge South to 33.2% in St Peter's — a gap of 16.9 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

Who could lead: The council's housing, public health and employment teams, with local services.

  1. Start now

    Check current advice and support access in St Peter's, using the census pattern as a starting point and asking residents what is missing.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test joined-up housing, work and health support, and publish who takes part, who cannot reach it and what changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained outcomes and whether gaps between neighbourhoods narrow, using comparable dates and measures.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 16.2% in Stalybridge South to 33.2% in St Peter's — a gap of 16.9 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 19 of 19 wards.

Measure: Access to support, unresolved housing problems and sustained work or health outcomes. Census percentages alone cannot measure a new programme's success.

Trade-off: Targeting neighbourhoods can miss people in need elsewhere. Avoid labelling every resident by the average for their ward.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages →

Ashton Market Square →

Stalybridge town-centre streets →

Former Hyde Library homes →

From evidence to delivery